test
test
Wednesday, April 23rd, 2008
Everyone speculated that McCain’s campaign was at death’s door after he reported low fundraising and very fast spending in the second financial quarter. He “only” raised 11.5 million in the second quarter, and his campaign debt placed his cash on hand below Ron Paul’s. McCain’s strong name recognition causes him to bounce around high enough in opinion polls that it’s difficult to calculate his exact campaign viability. However, a Washington Times article (pumpkin tip to The Right’s Field) provides a bleak picture: “The campaign has raised only $3.7 million to date for the quarter,” a longtime, influential friend of the Arizona Republican told The Washington Times. “The hope was to reach $4.5 million, about a third of what was raised in the ‘disastrous’ second quarter,’ ” said the McCain supporter, who has access to the senator’s daily campaign operations. Reports of Paul’s third quarter fundraising efforts have been relatively rosy. He raised 2.4 million in the second quarter, yet recently netted a half-million in one week. His campaign has also broken its one-day fundraising records at least twice this quarter. There’s a real possibility that Paul will overtake McCain this quarter not only in cash on hand, but also in overall funds raised. The potential publicity from such an event could provide a major boost to Paul’s campaign.
McCain’s Empty Bank Account
Thursday, September 20th, 2007
Yesterday, Michael Peroutka endorsed Ron Paul for president. Peroutka (for whom I voted) was the Constitution Party’s nominee in the 2004 presidential election.
Peroutka Endorses Paul
Thursday, September 20th, 2007
The Columbus Dispatch provides a list of 20 must-know classical pieces. I listened to all the clips and recognized about 75% of the pieces, although many of them I couldn’t previously identify by name. Here is an explanation of the choices, which is helpful to a musical illiterate like myself. The only problem now is that I want the full pieces, but I don’t want to drop $20 on iTunes. I suppose illegal downloading is still considered unethical. Of course, I’m sure all these compositions are in the public domain, but I don’t believe that applies for specific renditions.
The Classics
Wednesday, September 19th, 2007
There’s a fundraiser on at Paul’s campaign site. The goal is to get 1787 donors by Friday in celebration of Constitution Day. I gave $25. You should do the same.
1787 in 5
Tuesday, September 18th, 2007
The Daily Kos offers this view of the taser incident. It’s from the perspective of both a liberal (read: not knee-jerk pro-cop) and someone who was present at the event, which should grant it some credence. A Salon blogger notes that the officers used the “drive stun” mode when tasering Meyer. He writes: In typical Taser operation, the gun shoots out electrode darts at a target. The darts incapacitate the target. Drive stun mode, on the other hand, is meant for close contact. There are no shooting electrodes - the gun is placed directly on a target’s skin. Drive stun does not incapacitate a target. He merely feels a great deal of pain that officers hope will induce compliance.Observations on Taser Incident
Tuesday, September 18th, 2007
You’ve probably heard the news, maybe even seen the video, about University of Florida student Andrew Meyer being tasered and arrested yesterday “just for asking a question” at a John Kerry event. NBC has a video here and one of several videos from a different perspective is available here. According to his arrest report, it’s recommended Meyer be charged with “resisting an officer with violence,” “disturbing the peace,” and “interference with school administration functions.” Libertarians have jumped on this as an example of “police brutality.” Democrats are accusing the police of suppressing free speech, saying “some cops could benefit from a good beating.” Michael Savage insists that a “bull-dyke fascist” tasered Meyer for “[asking] Kerry too many questions.” I’ll admit I’m biased - I am very pro-cop. However, I’ll also admit police do sometimes go overboard and legitimate cases of police brutality do exist. This is not one of them. As documented in the arrest report, Kerry participated in a short question and answer session after his speech. The organizers had officially ended the Q&A when Meyer charged down the aisle. He obscenely demanded he be allowed to pose a question, saying, “You will take my question because I have been listening to your crap for two hours.” Kerry graciously (I say this as a non-Kerry supporter) agreed to take Meyer’s question. At that point, one of the arresting officers asked Meyer if he was a student, to which he responded with a hostile “I don’t have to tell you.” So Meyer posed an antagonistic question, asking Kerry why he conceded the 2004 presidential election in light of ostensible voter fraud. Without giving him a chance to respond, Meyer peppered Kerry with two more confrontational questions which included an obscene reference to oral sex. The event organizer ordered Meyer’s mic cut and requested the police remove Meyer from the auditorium. After requesting Meyer accompany them so they could speak with him, officers began to escort him out. Meyer immediately began screaming and flailing his arms about. As one officer says and the videos document, “He attempted to break our grips on his arms and began to actively resist by struggling, twisting and pushing.” Another officer reports: Officer Wise and I grabbed both of the man’s arms and asked him to come with us out of the auditorium to speak with us. The man then lifted me up and pushed Officer Wise to avoid being taken into custody… [Various officers] tried to assist…in getting a hold of the punching and kicking irate man… The man continued to scream and yell as well as push, kick, and elbow the officers attempting to take him into custody. After multiple attempts to tell him to stop resisting, the man said, “No” and continued to push and elbow the officers. Only one handcuff was placed on the man as he continued to punch his way out of the hold. The officers could not get a hold of his other arm as he was kicking, punching, and elbowing into officers. Notice the last two sentences. I recently took an arrest and control class, where one of the first things I learned regarding handcuffing technique is the danger presented by an unsubdued arrestee wearing only one cuff. Such a person can easily use the unsecured cuff as a gouging weapon. In fact, officers wisely attempted to tase Meyer at that point. One officer writes: “Due to Meyer’s erratic flailing, the inability to attain Meyer’s left arm from his resistance, and increased potential for injury with one cuff on, Sgt. King attempted to deploy a contact tase to no avail.” The officers managed to take Meyer to the ground. He still resisted arrest by refusing to place his arms in handcuff position, shouting obscenities, and attempting to rise from the ground. In the second video, you can clearly hear an officer say, “Put your hands behind your back and you won’t be tased.” In the NBC video, officers warn Meyer multiple times that “you will be tased [if you don’t cooperate].” Finally, after his continued noncooperation, officers tased Meyer and succeeded in handcuffing him. Obviously unharmed, Meyer then stood and walked out of the auditorium with officers, talking the whole time. While he was “escorted down stairs with no cameras in sight, he remained quiet, but once the cameras made their way down stairs he started screaming and yelling again.” Whether for the cameras or because he really believed it, he began babbling irrationally. The NBC video documents his comments after leaving the auditorium. Among other things, he tells the officers, “You can’t just, like, kill me.” He also cries, “Oh my God, you’re giving me to the government,” and tells the officers, “I’m afraid to tell you [my name].” As he’s being led off, he tells bystanders, “They are going to try and kill me.” He was apparently acting for the camera, as the arrest report says, “Meyer was laughing and being lighthearted in the car, his demeanor completely changed once the cameras were not in sight.” During the ride to jail, he told officers, “I am not mad at you guys, you didn’t do anything wrong, you were just trying to do your job.” Basically, Meyer was disruptive after the event ended. He harangued Kerry. He refused to leave the auditorium upon request. He assaulted the officers trying to make him leave. He resisted arrest. Inductive reasoning would indicate Meyer was deliberately trying to cause a scene and playing to the camera. My conclusion is that since he was at a privately hosted event, Meyer had no intrinsic right to free speech in that venue. He deserved to be kicked out for his belligerent, disruptive behavior and he earned an arrest the instant he assaulted the police officers. Later I’ll address the wisdom of tasering Meyer under these conditions.
Police “Brutality” in Florida
Tuesday, September 18th, 2007
Alan Keyes, that embodiment of political success, has announced he will seek the presidency. Again. Third time’s the charm, right? Perhaps I’m being mean. I like Keyes on many levels and I must admit he’s a brilliant speaker. But he’s a political failure who has run for president twice and for U.S. Senate thrice, losing by vast margins every time. Keyes is good on many of the issues. He’s strongly pro-family and pro-life, he advocates a return to constitutional government, he favors real immigration reform and the abolition of the income tax, and he supports an unrestricted right to keep and bear arms. He’s also slightly schizophrenic, as he supports the wars in Iraq and on “terrorism,” yet as recently as 2004 said: I would want to renounce the idea that we have the right to interfere, in an aggressive way, with the affairs of other nations. I think we can play a constructive role in trying to bring about diplomatic solutions in different parts of the world, but I do not believe that when our ideas are rejected, we should resort to war in order to force people to accept a deal that’s dictated on our terms. I’m looking forward to his campaign site going live so I can read his position on Iraq and compare it to the above comment. Anyways, say you have two candidates. One is politically successful and perfect on the issues and one is a political failure and almost perfect on the issues. Common sense dictates supporting the former, especially if he’s already been in the race for months gaining name recognition, votes, and campaign cash. The former candidate is, of course, Ron Paul. He has millions in the bank and the ability to win votes from conservative Republicans, Democrats, independents, Libertarians, Constitution Party members, and former non-voters. Keyes has neither, though he does have five electoral defeats to Paul’s three non-incumbent Congressional victories. Paul has the proven ability to win elections in the face of long odds, while Keyes has never even been elected as city dog-catcher. Keyes gives the Constitution a lot of lip service and posits a desire to return to staunchly constitutional government. Considering Paul wants the exact same thing and has made much progress towards that goal, it’s only sensible for Keyes to drop out and endorse Congressman Ron Paul.
Alan Keyes
Saturday, September 15th, 2007
Peanut butter is the answer to world hunger. As someone who’s broken his fast with a peanut butter sandwich every morning for years, I could have told you that. Large amounts of fat, calories, protein, and carbs all packed into a small spoonful. Of course peanut butter is the answer.
Peanut Butter
Friday, September 14th, 2007
In case you missed it, need to show it to someone who did, or just plain want to see it again, here is Paul’s hard-hitting and firey performance at last night’s debate in New Hampshire. While the Fox News moderators still refuse to give Paul any questions that would allow him to demonstrate his sold, constitutional stances on issues such as healthcare, immigration, abortion, or taxes, he knocked the ball miles out of the park with his responses to questions about Iraq.
Ron Paul Rocks at GOP Debate
Thursday, September 6th, 2007





